On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:56:42AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Completely random comment, but isn't it easier to just enable the safe
> > bitstream reader?
> >
>
> This is actually enabled by default, so it probably should never hav
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:32 PM, foo86 wrote:
>
>> Limit the maximum length of unary part of Rice code by the number of
>> available bits instead of using an arbitrary constant that happens to be
>> just large enough to work.
>>
>>
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:32 PM, foo86 wrote:
> Limit the maximum length of unary part of Rice code by the number of
> available bits instead of using an arbitrary constant that happens to be
> just large enough to work.
>
> This effectively limits amount of data that can be overread per segm
