2017-10-05 21:44 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos :
> I tested the following with the sample from ticket #503:
> $ ffmpeg -i rgba64le-lzw.tif -vf palettegen pal.png
> $ ffmpeg -i rgba64le-lzw.tif -i pal.png -lavfi paletteuse out.gif
>
> The output file has its background (that is supposed to be
> transp
2017-10-05 16:43 GMT+02:00 Bjorn Roche :
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>> 2017-10-03 1:52 GMT+02:00 Bjorn Roche :
>>
>> > Attached is a patch for paletteuse only.
>>
>> I tested the following with and without your patch:
>> $ ffmpeg -i fate-suite/lena.pnm -vf paletteg
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:43:04AM -0400, Bjorn Roche wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
> > 2017-10-03 1:52 GMT+02:00 Bjorn Roche :
> >
> > > Attached is a patch for paletteuse only.
> >
> > I tested the following with and without your patch:
> > $ ffmpeg -i fate-
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-10-03 1:52 GMT+02:00 Bjorn Roche :
>
> > Attached is a patch for paletteuse only.
>
> I tested the following with and without your patch:
> $ ffmpeg -i fate-suite/lena.pnm -vf palettegen pal.png
> $ ffmpeg -i fate-suite/lena.pnm -i pa
2017-10-03 1:52 GMT+02:00 Bjorn Roche :
> Attached is a patch for paletteuse only.
I tested the following with and without your patch:
$ ffmpeg -i fate-suite/lena.pnm -vf palettegen pal.png
$ ffmpeg -i fate-suite/lena.pnm -i pal.png -lavfi paletteuse out.png
out.png changes with your patch: Is t
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-10-02 20:44 GMT+02:00 Bjorn Roche :
> > I submitted a complete patch separately
>
> No.
>
> What I wrote in my last email was (please
> do not top-post here):
> >> Instead please merge your paletteuse patches
> >> into one patch, I be
2017-10-02 20:44 GMT+02:00 Bjorn Roche :
> I submitted a complete patch separately
No.
What I wrote in my last email was (please
do not top-post here):
>> Instead please merge your paletteuse patches
>> into one patch, I believe the new patch should
>> allow to encode a single RGBA frame with
>>
I submitted a complete patch separately (
http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-September/216793.html), but
this is how git-email formatted things. How would you like me to proceed?
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-10-02 19:24 GMT+02:00 Bjorn Roche :
> > Fro
2017-10-02 19:24 GMT+02:00 Bjorn Roche :
> From: Bjorn Roche
> -printf( "alpha 1, 2: %d, %d\n", c1[0], c2[0] );
Instead please merge your paletteuse patches
into one patch, I believe the new patch should
allow to encode a single RGBA frame with
transparency into pal8 png or similar.
Carl Eu
