On 15/09/17 22:56, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-09-15 23:53 GMT+02:00 Mark Thompson :
>> On 15/09/17 22:50, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> 2017-09-15 23:44 GMT+02:00 Mark Thompson :
On 15/09/17 22:43, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-09-15 22:51 GMT+02:00 Mark Thompson :
>> The planes hav
2017-09-15 23:53 GMT+02:00 Mark Thompson :
> On 15/09/17 22:50, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2017-09-15 23:44 GMT+02:00 Mark Thompson :
>>> On 15/09/17 22:43, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
2017-09-15 22:51 GMT+02:00 Mark Thompson :
> The planes have no reason to be contiguous, assuming they
>
On 15/09/17 22:50, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-09-15 23:44 GMT+02:00 Mark Thompson :
>> On 15/09/17 22:43, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> 2017-09-15 22:51 GMT+02:00 Mark Thompson :
The planes have no reason to be contiguous, assuming they
are results in very broken output.
>>>
>>> Is bein
2017-09-15 23:44 GMT+02:00 Mark Thompson :
> On 15/09/17 22:43, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2017-09-15 22:51 GMT+02:00 Mark Thompson :
>>> The planes have no reason to be contiguous, assuming they
>>> are results in very broken output.
>>
>> Is being contiguous a requirement of DRM?
>
> For multiple
On 15/09/17 22:43, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-09-15 22:51 GMT+02:00 Mark Thompson :
>> The planes have no reason to be contiguous, assuming they
>> are results in very broken output.
>
> Is being contiguous a requirement of DRM?
For multiple-plane formats, no. Hence the change.
- Mark
_
2017-09-15 22:51 GMT+02:00 Mark Thompson :
> The planes have no reason to be contiguous, assuming they
> are results in very broken output.
Is being contiguous a requirement of DRM?
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http:/
