Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] swscale: ayuv16 input support

2015-07-06 Thread Robert Krüger
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Paul B Mahol gmail.com> writes: > > > > Please mention the ticket in the commit message > > > for the swscaler output. > > > > Will, do. Although y416 have nothing to do with 16 bit ayuv. > > I completely agree but I think it turned out t

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] swscale: ayuv16 input support

2015-07-06 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Paul B Mahol gmail.com> writes: > > Please mention the ticket in the commit message > > for the swscaler output. > > Will, do. Although y416 have nothing to do with 16 bit ayuv. I completely agree but I think it turned out the the OP wasn't really interested in y416 but in your patch;-) Carl

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] swscale: ayuv16 input support

2015-07-06 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 7/6/15, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Carl Eugen Hoyos ag.or.at> writes: > >> Imo, AYUV64 is more consistent. > > Or YUVA64? YUVA is different from AYUV like RGBA is different from ARGB. > > Please mention the ticket in the commit message > for the swscaler output. Will, do. Although y416 have

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] swscale: ayuv16 input support

2015-07-06 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 7/6/15, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Paul B Mahol gmail.com> writes: > >> +static void read_ayuv16le_Y_c > > Wasn't the original request for output-only? > Is the input useful? Mostly for testing purposes. > > Imo, AYUV64 is more consistent. Yes, I think about that too. > > Carl Eugen > > ___

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] swscale: ayuv16 input support

2015-07-06 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Carl Eugen Hoyos ag.or.at> writes: > Imo, AYUV64 is more consistent. Or YUVA64? Please mention the ticket in the commit message for the swscaler output. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/list

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] swscale: ayuv16 input support

2015-07-06 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Paul B Mahol gmail.com> writes: > +static void read_ayuv16le_Y_c Wasn't the original request for output-only? Is the input useful? Imo, AYUV64 is more consistent. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mai

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] swscale: ayuv16 input support

2015-07-03 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 09:59:58PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 04:16:32PM +, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol > > --- > > libswscale/input.c| 36 > > libswscale/swscale_internal.h | 2 ++ > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] swscale: ayuv16 input support

2015-07-03 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 04:16:32PM +, Paul B Mahol wrote: > Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol > --- > libswscale/input.c| 36 > libswscale/swscale_internal.h | 2 ++ > libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c | 1 + > libswscale/utils.c| 2 +- >