On 16.12.2016 02:29, Rodger Combs wrote:
>> On Dec 15, 2016, at 19:21, Andreas Cadhalpun
>> wrote:
>> On 15.12.2016 14:02, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>>> - if for whatever reason some things cannot be done in generic code or by
>>> changing the type (this should really cover most cases), and we wan
> On Dec 15, 2016, at 19:21, Andreas Cadhalpun
> wrote:
>
> On 15.12.2016 14:02, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
>> andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On 14.12.2016 02:46, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Not wanting to discourage you, but I
On 15.12.2016 14:02, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
> andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On 14.12.2016 02:46, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>>> Not wanting to discourage you, but I wonder if there's really a point to
>>> this...?
>>
>> These patche
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:57:57PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 08:02:52AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
> > > andre
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 08:02:52AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
> > andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 14.12.2016 02:46, Ronald S. Bultje wr
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 08:02:52AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
> andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 14.12.2016 02:46, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > > Not wanting to discourage you, but I wonder if there's really a poin
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 14.12.2016 02:46, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Not wanting to discourage you, but I wonder if there's really a point to
> > this...?
>
> These patches are prerequisites for enforcing the validity
On 14.12.2016 03:54, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 01:57:54AM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun
>> ---
>> libavformat/4xm.c | 8 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> LGTM
Pushed.
Best regards,
Andreas
_
On 14.12.2016 02:46, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Not wanting to discourage you, but I wonder if there's really a point to
> this...?
These patches are prerequisites for enforcing the validity of codec
parameters [1].
> I don't see how the user experience changes.
Users won't see ffmpeg claiming no
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 01:57:54AM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun
> ---
> libavformat/4xm.c | 8 +++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
LGTM
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Many things
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 14.12.2016 02:01, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
> > andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhal
On 14.12.2016 02:01, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
> andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun
>> ---
>> libavformat/4xm.c | 8 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --g
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun
> ---
> libavformat/4xm.c | 8 +++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavformat/4xm.c b/libavformat/4xm.c
> index 8a50778..2
13 matches
Mail list logo