Steve Lhomme:
>> On April 7, 2019 at 11:24 AM Andreas Rheinhardt via ffmpeg-devel
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Steve Lhomme:
>>> On 3/27/2019 12:18 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
ebml_read_num had a number of flaws:
1. The check for read errors/EOF was totally wrong. E.g. an
> On April 7, 2019 at 11:24 AM Andreas Rheinhardt via ffmpeg-devel
> wrote:
>
>
> Steve Lhomme:
> > On 3/27/2019 12:18 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> >> ebml_read_num had a number of flaws:
> >>
> >> 1. The check for read errors/EOF was totally wrong. E.g. an EBML number
> >>
Steve Lhomme:
> On 3/27/2019 12:18 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
>> ebml_read_num had a number of flaws:
>>
>> 1. The check for read errors/EOF was totally wrong. E.g. an EBML number
>> beginning with the invalid 0x00 would be considered a read error,
>> although it is just invalid
On 3/27/2019 12:18 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
ebml_read_num had a number of flaws:
1. The check for read errors/EOF was totally wrong. E.g. an EBML number
beginning with the invalid 0x00 would be considered a read error,
although it is just invalid data.
2. The check for read
