On Thu, 27 Feb 2025, Krzysztof Pyrkosz via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
---
I was curious whether it's possible to implement this function without
any widening, and it turns out it not only is, but it's quite
performant at the same time!
The idea is to split the 16 bit coefficients into lower and upper
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:49:53 +0100 Andreas Rheinhardt
wrote:
> Niklas Haas:
> > On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:31:19 +0800 Zhao Zhili
> > wrote:
> >> Cc haasn.
> >>
> >> Libswscale in under refactor. Does current asm works after refactor, or
> >> they need to be refactored or
> >> rewrite after? If it
Niklas Haas:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:31:19 +0800 Zhao Zhili wrote:
>> Cc haasn.
>>
>> Libswscale in under refactor. Does current asm works after refactor, or they
>> need to be refactored or
>> rewrite after? If it’s the second case, maybe we should hold on to do more
>> asm with libswscale
>>
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025, Niklas Haas wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:31:19 +0800 Zhao Zhili wrote:
Cc haasn.
Libswscale in under refactor. Does current asm works after refactor, or they
need to be refactored or
rewrite after? If it’s the second case, maybe we should hold on to do more asm
with li
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:31:19 +0800 Zhao Zhili wrote:
> Cc haasn.
>
> Libswscale in under refactor. Does current asm works after refactor, or they
> need to be refactored or
> rewrite after? If it’s the second case, maybe we should hold on to do more
> asm with libswscale
> before hassn work done
Cc haasn.
Libswscale in under refactor. Does current asm works after refactor, or they
need to be refactored or
rewrite after? If it’s the second case, maybe we should hold on to do more asm
with libswscale
before hassn work done.
> On Feb 28, 2025, at 06:44, Krzysztof Pyrkosz via ffmpeg-devel
