On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 03:18:49AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> This seems to break a full "make fate"
OK, removing the offending line and resending.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ff
On 8/1/2017 7:48 PM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> The height convention for decoding frames with only a single field made sense
> for compatibility with legacy decoders, but doesn't really match the
> convention
> used by NDI, which is the primary (only?) user. Thus, change it to simply
> assumin
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:51:17AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:48:38AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > Also add simple FATE tests, based on output produced by the NDI SDK.
>
> Here are the required samples. I couldn't find much documentation on how to
> a
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:48:38AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> The height convention for decoding frames with only a single field made sense
> for compatibility with legacy decoders, but doesn't really match the
> convention
> used by NDI, which is the primary (only?) user. Thus, change i
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:48:38AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Also add simple FATE tests, based on output produced by the NDI SDK.
Here are the required samples. I couldn't find much documentation on how to
add tests to FATE, so everything has been done by cargo culting.
/* Steinar */
-
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:57:24AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> The height convention for decoding frames with only a single field made sense
> for compatibility with legacy decoders, but doesn't really match the
> convention
> used by NDI, which is the primary (only?) user. Thus, change i
