Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavf/udp: fix dead code.

2016-06-03 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:08:51PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Le sextidi 16 prairial, an CCXXIV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > > Do you know how to change the push URL for one repository in gitolite? > > I know how to change it for all repositories but only ffmpeg uses the > > videolan server

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavf/udp: fix dead code.

2016-06-03 Thread Nicolas George
Le sextidi 16 prairial, an CCXXIV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > Do you know how to change the push URL for one repository in gitolite? > I know how to change it for all repositories but only ffmpeg uses the > videolan server for git push, all other repositories we have > use our own server. > It

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavf/udp: fix dead code.

2016-06-03 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:05:06PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:00:46PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > > Le sextidi 16 prairial, an CCXXIV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > > > ok > > > thanks > > > > Thanks. I pushed to g...@source.ffmpeg.org:ffmpeg, it appears on

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavf/udp: fix dead code.

2016-06-03 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:00:46PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Le sextidi 16 prairial, an CCXXIV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > > ok > > thanks > > Thanks. I pushed to g...@source.ffmpeg.org:ffmpeg, it appears on the yes, that is and always was the push url > mailing-list but not on https

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavf/udp: fix dead code.

2016-06-03 Thread Nicolas George
Le sextidi 16 prairial, an CCXXIV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > ok > thanks Thanks. I pushed to g...@source.ffmpeg.org:ffmpeg, it appears on the mailing-list but not on https://git.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.git, and I have no permissions for g...@git.ffmpeg.org:ffmpeg. Am I doing something wrong? Rega

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavf/udp: fix dead code.

2016-06-03 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:21:23AM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Since d607861, service can not be NULL, only "0". > An UDP address with neither local port nor address leaves both > service and node to their default value, and POSIX specifies > that they are not allowed to be both NULL; "0" is equ