On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 22:36:26 + (UTC)
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Philip Langdale overt.org> writes:
>
> > -if (av_vdpau_bind_context(s, ctx->device,
> > ctx->get_proc_address, 0))
> > +if (av_vdpau_bind_context(s, ctx->device,
> > ctx->get_proc_address, AV_HWACCEL_FLAG_IGNORE_LEVEL))
Philip Langdale overt.org> writes:
> -if (av_vdpau_bind_context(s, ctx->device, ctx->get_proc_address, 0))
> +if (av_vdpau_bind_context(s, ctx->device, ctx->get_proc_address,
> AV_HWACCEL_FLAG_IGNORE_LEVEL))
Shouldn't this be the default?
How can a level ever be a reason to fail?
Carl
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:33:18 +0200
wm4 wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 21:27:58 -0700
> Philip Langdale wrote:
>
> > The h264 decoder reports 4.1 as its maximum level, but it will
> > decode 5.1 4K video just fine. In practice, the published level
> > limits in vdpau do not communicate anything th
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 21:27:58 -0700
Philip Langdale wrote:
> The h264 decoder reports 4.1 as its maximum level, but it will decode
> 5.1 4K video just fine. In practice, the published level limits in
> vdpau do not communicate anything that's actually useful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philip Langdale
>
