On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 08:30:07PM +0200, martin schitter wrote:
>
>
> On 24.09.24 01:48, martin schitter wrote:
> > > they should be T:
> > > feel free to send a patch fixing that, or ill fix it later
>
> Although you fixed one occurrence of this issue by f2aba7 it's still present
> on the next
On 24.09.24 01:48, martin schitter wrote:
they should be T:
feel free to send a patch fixing that, or ill fix it later
Although you fixed one occurrence of this issue by f2aba7 it's still
present on the next line.
My patch would have fixed both of them. ;)
Martin
___
On 24.09.24 00:31, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Btw.: the fate info and the "webserver"-entry one line above use
(S:...)-entries, which aren't mentioned as a possible variant in the
descriptive top section of MAINTAINERS. Shouldn't these be (T:...)-
or (W: ...)-entries or the (S: ...) kind be
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 12:27:19PM +0200, Martin Schitter wrote:
> v2 adds the address as a second (L: ...)-entry
> to the Fate info in MAINTAINERS.
>
> I'm not sure if this is correct because I couldn't find other lines,
> where the same kind of entry gets used twice.
>
> Btw.: the fate info a
