On 2/18/2024 9:08 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 01:16:36PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
Save for the Microsoft C Runtime library, where free() can't handle aligned
buffers, aligned_malloc() should be available and working on all supported
targets.
Also, malloc() alone may b
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 01:16:36PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> Save for the Microsoft C Runtime library, where free() can't handle aligned
> buffers, aligned_malloc() should be available and working on all supported
> targets.
> Also, malloc() alone may be sufficient if alignment requirement is low
Le sunnuntaina 18. helmikuuta 2024, 18.29.32 EET James Almer a écrit :
> Removing all the different target specific allocation functions in favor
> of the standard one. But your second point makes it moot, so patch
> withdrawn.
If you want to get code closer to standards for dealing with alignment
Le sunnuntaina 18. helmikuuta 2024, 18.16.36 EET James Almer a écrit :
> Save for the Microsoft C Runtime library, where free() can't handle aligned
> buffers, aligned_malloc() should be available and working on all supported
> targets.
> Also, malloc() alone may be sufficient if alignment requirem
Le sunnuntaina 18. helmikuuta 2024, 18.27.35 EET Andreas Rheinhardt a écrit :
> 1. The function is called aligned_alloc (how did you test this?).
> 2. C11: "The value of alignment shall be a valid alignment supported by
> the implementation and the value of size shall be an integral multiple
> of a
On 2/18/2024 1:27 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
Save for the Microsoft C Runtime library, where free() can't handle aligned
buffers, aligned_malloc() should be available and working on all supported
targets.
Also, malloc() alone may be sufficient if alignment requirement is low, so
James Almer:
> Save for the Microsoft C Runtime library, where free() can't handle aligned
> buffers, aligned_malloc() should be available and working on all supported
> targets.
> Also, malloc() alone may be sufficient if alignment requirement is low, so add
> a check for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: J
