On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 01:48:05PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> The code already had skipping of initial padding, but discarding
> trailing frame padding was missing.
>
> This is somewhat questionable, because it will make the decoder discard
> any data after the declared file size in the LAME header. But
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:10:19AM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> The code already had skipping of initial padding, but discarding
> trailing frame padding was missing.
>
> This is somewhat questionable, because it will make the decoder discard
> any data after the declared file size in the LAME header. But
