On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:38:23PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:06:27 -0300
> James Almer wrote:
>
> > On 4/14/2016 7:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:25:43PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:10:09 +0200
> > >> Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:06:27 -0300
James Almer wrote:
> On 4/14/2016 7:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:25:43PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:10:09 +0200
> >> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:32:07AM +0200, Micha
On 4/14/2016 7:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:25:43PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:10:09 +0200
>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:32:07AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:25:43PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:10:09 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:32:07AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> > > sample.
> > >
> >
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:18:10PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 at 13:10, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > new version of this with improved documentation
> > I intend to apply this soon if noone is against
> >
> >
> > From e500dd31368b760144b1e2b5b09
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:10:09 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:32:07AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> > sample.
> >
> > The field is added at the logical place, not at the end as the cod
On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 at 13:10, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> new version of this with improved documentation
> I intend to apply this soon if noone is against
>
>
> From e500dd31368b760144b1e2b5b094f73b571b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michael Niedermayer
> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:32:07AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> sample.
>
> The field is added at the logical place, not at the end as the code was just
> recently added
>
> This fixes the regression about loosing t
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 13:26:54 +0200
Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:17 PM, wm4 wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:52:51 +0200
> > Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM, wm4 wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:12:20 +0200
> >> > Michael Niedermay
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:17 PM, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:52:51 +0200
> Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM, wm4 wrote:
>> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:12:20 +0200
>> > Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:39:57PM +, Kieran Kunhya
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:52:51 +0200
Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM, wm4 wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:12:20 +0200
> > Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:39:57PM +, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 00:33 Michael
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:12:20 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:39:57PM +, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 00:33 Michael Niedermayer
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > The bits_per_raw_sample represents the
On 4/11/16, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:12:20 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:39:57PM +, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 00:33 Michael Niedermayer
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:12:20 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:39:57PM +, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 00:33 Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> > > sample.
> > >
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:39:57PM +, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 00:33 Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
> > The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> > sample.
> >
> > The field is added at the logical place, not at the end as the code was
> >
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:40:43AM +0100, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> On 4/11/2016 12:32 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> > sample.
> >
> > The field is added at the logical place, not at the end as the code was just
> > re
On 4/11/2016 12:32 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> sample.
>
> The field is added at the logical place, not at the end as the code was just
> recently added
>
> This fixes the regression about loosing the audio sample pre
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 00:33 Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> sample.
>
> The field is added at the logical place, not at the end as the code was
> just
> recently added
>
> This fixes the regression about loosing the audio sam
18 matches
Mail list logo
