On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 08:44:30PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> previously quality could only be set through qscale/global_quality but the
> scale
> was inverted. Using a separate option avoids the confusion from qscale working
> backward.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer
> ---
> l
On 03/11/14 1:11 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 08:44:30PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> previously quality could only be set through qscale/global_quality but the
>> scale
>> was inverted. Using a separate option avoids the confusion from qscale
>> working
>> backward.
Le tridi 13 brumaire, an CCXXIII, Clement Boesch a écrit :
> Can't we use "vpx_quality" or something? it sounds like a very generic
> option name...
If several codecs use "quality" for a target quality value using a
codec-specific scale, I think it is fine. It could work the same for
libvorbis (og
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 08:44:30PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> previously quality could only be set through qscale/global_quality but the
> scale
> was inverted. Using a separate option avoids the confusion from qscale working
> backward.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer
> ---
> l
Hi,
- Mail original -
> previously quality could only be set through qscale/global_quality
> but the scale
> was inverted. Using a separate option avoids the confusion from
> qscale working
> backward.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer
> ---
> libavcodec/libwebpenc.c |8 ---
