Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] aacenc: mark coders other than twoloop as experimental

2015-12-03 Thread Claudio Freire
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > Any opposition? Not from me ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] aacenc: mark coders other than twoloop as experimental

2015-12-03 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
Any opposition? On 2 December 2015 at 19:47, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > This commit marks any coders beside twoloop as experimental and gives > out a warning that some of they might be silently removed in the future. > > Users are highly encouraged to use the twoloop coder, which is the > def

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] aacenc: mark coders other than twoloop as experimental

2015-12-02 Thread Hendrik Leppkes
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Claudio Freire wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov > wrote: >> This commit marks any coders beside twoloop as experimental and gives >> out a warning that some of they might be silently removed in the future. >> >> Users are highly encour

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] aacenc: mark coders other than twoloop as experimental

2015-12-02 Thread Claudio Freire
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > This commit marks any coders beside twoloop as experimental and gives > out a warning that some of they might be silently removed in the future. > > Users are highly encouraged to use the twoloop coder, which is the > default. > --- >