On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Matt Oliver wrote:
> On 30 October 2016 at 17:57, Michael Forney wrote:
>
>> On 10/29/16, Matt Oliver wrote:
>> > This also seems a bit odd, why is libreSSL setting an openssl version
>> > number of 1.1.0 or higher when it doesnt actually conform to the
>> > corre
On 30 October 2016 at 17:57, Michael Forney wrote:
> On 10/29/16, Matt Oliver wrote:
> > This also seems a bit odd, why is libreSSL setting an openssl version
> > number of 1.1.0 or higher when it doesnt actually conform to the
> > corresponding openssl version. LibreSSl setting the openssl vers
On 10/29/16, Matt Oliver wrote:
> This also seems a bit odd, why is libreSSL setting an openssl version
> number of 1.1.0 or higher when it doesnt actually conform to the
> corresponding openssl version. LibreSSl setting the openssl version number
> to 2.0.0 seems to be problematic and causes prob
On 30 October 2016 at 09:39, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:47:08AM -0700, Michael Forney wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Forney
> > ---
> > libavformat/tls_openssl.c | 12 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libavform
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:47:08AM -0700, Michael Forney wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michael Forney
> ---
> libavformat/tls_openssl.c | 12 ++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavformat/tls_openssl.c b/libavformat/tls_openssl.c
> index c551ac7..9712856 1
