On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
>
> Is there anything that precludes switching 2.X to pkg-config and leaving
> 1.X as is?
No, switching 2.x to pkg-config isn't dependent on dropping 1.x. But since
I plan to do both, I figure I might as well do them together since they're
On 10/8/2017 4:18 PM, Michael Bradshaw wrote:
> I can clean these up as part of the patch that drops OpenJPEG 1.x support,
> which I plan on making after the next release (though of course someone
> else is welcome to beat me to it; it seems there's a race for OpenJPEG
> patches!).
Is there anythi
I can clean these up as part of the patch that drops OpenJPEG 1.x support,
which I plan on making after the next release (though of course someone
else is welcome to beat me to it; it seems there's a race for OpenJPEG
patches!).
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing l
On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 13:43:45 +0200
Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 04:51:49PM +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
> > OpenJPEG 2.3 was released a few days ago. Changelog reports "No
> > API/ABI break compared to v2.2.0 but additional symbols for subset
> > of components decoding"
> >
> > This
On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 04:51:49PM +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
> OpenJPEG 2.3 was released a few days ago. Changelog reports "No API/ABI
> break compared to v2.2.0 but additional symbols for subset of components
> decoding"
>
> This patch is adapted from an earlier patch which added support for 2.2.
