Ok, sounds good; I'll get this rebased; one small patch is gonna take
longer than expected.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 9:39 AM Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
>
> On 06.08.2024 18:29, Mondain wrote:
> > Just a curiosity thing; why would the spec need to be out of alpha, yet the
> > other codecs are already
On 06.08.2024 18:29, Mondain wrote:
Just a curiosity thing; why would the spec need to be out of alpha, yet the
other codecs are already in ffmpeg? Just no preference for VP8 itself,
while its still in-spec for tech like WebRTC? Again, just seems odd that
I've run into this type of messaging befo
Timo, I've created the PR here: https://github.com/BtbN/FFmpeg/pull/2
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 9:29 AM Mondain wrote:
> Just a curiosity thing; why would the spec need to be out of alpha, yet
> the other codecs are already in ffmpeg? Just no preference for VP8 itself,
> while its still in-spec for
Just a curiosity thing; why would the spec need to be out of alpha, yet the
other codecs are already in ffmpeg? Just no preference for VP8 itself,
while its still in-spec for tech like WebRTC? Again, just seems odd that
I've run into this type of messaging before.
Best Regards,
Paul
On Mon, Aug 5
On 05.08.2024 16:01, Mondain wrote:
Fixes: Reading and writing of VP8 media in FLV files, to match
existing enhanced codecs
This will be part of the already finished enhanced rtmp v2 patch set,
but the spec needs to be out of alpha first.
VP8 is in fact missing, since I didn't think anyone wou
