On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:26:16AM -0600, Roger Pack wrote:
> On 6/24/15, compn wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 04:30:10 -0600
> > Roger Pack wrote:
> >
> >> Received signal %d: terminating.
> >>
> >> Today sounds as if the process is "hard exiting" (like SIGKILL or some
> >> odd) when it might be
On 6/24/15, compn wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 04:30:10 -0600
> Roger Pack wrote:
>
>> Received signal %d: terminating.
>>
>> Today sounds as if the process is "hard exiting" (like SIGKILL or some
>> odd) when it might be as benign as a ctrl+c that is used as a normal
>> shutdown process.
>>
>> P
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 04:30:10 -0600
Roger Pack wrote:
> Received signal %d: terminating.
>
> Today sounds as if the process is "hard exiting" (like SIGKILL or some
> odd) when it might be as benign as a ctrl+c that is used as a normal
> shutdown process.
>
> Perhaps it could be made to be someth
Hello again.
I was thinking this text:
Received signal %d: terminating.
Today sounds as if the process is "hard exiting" (like SIGKILL or some
odd) when it might be as benign as a ctrl+c that is used as a normal
shutdown process.
Perhaps it could be made to be something like:
Shutting down beca
