Hello,
Here are the results.
lavu CAMELLIA size: 1048576 runs: 1024 time: 21.476 +- 0.034
crypto CAMELLIA size: 1048576 runs: 1024 time: 20.184 +- 0.043
gcrypt CAMELLIA size: 1048576 runs: 1024 time: 64.362 +- 1.031
tomcrypt CAMELLIA size: 1048576
Hi Supraja,
could you also post the result of crypto_bench now to see how fast our
implementation is compared to the others?
Thanks.
Giorgio Vazzana
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:31:24PM +0530, supraja reddy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > +AV_WB64(y,KE);
> > > +
> > KE=SP[0][y[0]]^SP[1][y[1]]^SP[2][y[2]]^SP[3][y[3]]^SP[4][y[4]]^SP[5][y[5]]^SP[6][y[6]]^SP[7][y[7]];
> > > +return KE;
> >
> > have you tried it without the y[] array ?
> > storing and
Hello,
> +AV_WB64(y,KE);
> > +
> KE=SP[0][y[0]]^SP[1][y[1]]^SP[2][y[2]]^SP[3][y[3]]^SP[4][y[4]]^SP[5][y[5]]^SP[6][y[6]]^SP[7][y[7]];
> > +return KE;
>
> have you tried it without the y[] array ?
> storing and loading from memory may (or may not) be slower
I have tried without y[] array.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:44:23AM +0530, supraja reddy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have attached a patch to optimize the camellia block cipher.
> I ran crypto_bench on the optimized version. Here are the results of
> runtime using crypto_bench.
>
> Before the changes :
> lavu CAMELLIA size:
Hello,
I have attached a patch to optimize the camellia block cipher.
I ran crypto_bench on the optimized version. Here are the results of
runtime using crypto_bench.
Before the changes :
lavu CAMELLIA size: 1048576 runs: 1024 time: 32.541 +- 0.044
After the changes:
lavu C
