2017-11-13 6:41 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2017-11-12 20:30 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
>>> wrote:
2017-11-12 20:05 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
> The attached
Am 16.11.17 um 19:24 schrieb Thilo Borgmann:
> Am 14.11.17 um 08:23 schrieb Umair Khan:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:05 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> 2017-11-13 6:41 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
wrote:
> 2017-11-
Am 14.11.17 um 08:23 schrieb Umair Khan:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:05 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2017-11-13 6:41 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
>>> wrote:
2017-11-12 20:30 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
> Hi,
>
> O
2017-11-15 8:54 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
> I'm now moving to the ALS encoder tasks before we start with the next GSoC.
Great!
Thank you, Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-11-14 23:48 GMT+01:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos :
>> 2017-11-13 21:07 GMT+01:00 Thilo Borgmann :
>>> Am 13.11.17 um 21:06 schrieb Thilo Borgmann:
Am 13.11.17 um 20:02 schrieb Umair Khan:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at
2017-11-14 23:48 GMT+01:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos :
> 2017-11-13 21:07 GMT+01:00 Thilo Borgmann :
>> Am 13.11.17 um 21:06 schrieb Thilo Borgmann:
>>> Am 13.11.17 um 20:02 schrieb Umair Khan:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Thilo Borgmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Mon, N
2017-11-13 21:07 GMT+01:00 Thilo Borgmann :
> Am 13.11.17 um 21:06 schrieb Thilo Borgmann:
>> Am 13.11.17 um 20:02 schrieb Umair Khan:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Thilo Borgmann
>>> wrote:
Hi,
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
> wrote:
>
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:05 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-11-13 6:41 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> 2017-11-12 20:30 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
wro
2017-11-13 6:41 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2017-11-12 20:30 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
>>> wrote:
2017-11-12 20:05 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
> The attached
Am 13.11.17 um 21:06 schrieb Thilo Borgmann:
> Am 13.11.17 um 20:02 schrieb Umair Khan:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Thilo Borgmann
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
wrote:
> 2017-11-12 20:30 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
>> Hi,
Am 13.11.17 um 20:02 schrieb Umair Khan:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Thilo Borgmann
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
>>> wrote:
2017-11-12 20:30 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Carl Euge
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> 2017-11-12 20:30 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
wrote:
> 2017-11-12 20:05 GMT+01:00 Umair K
Hi,
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2017-11-12 20:30 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
>>> wrote:
2017-11-12 20:05 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
> The attached patch fixes the address sanitizer issue.
>
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-11-12 20:30 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
>> wrote:
>>> 2017-11-12 20:05 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
>>>
The attached patch fixes the address sanitizer issue.
>>>
>>> Bre
2017-11-12 20:30 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2017-11-12 20:05 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
>>
>>> The attached patch fixes the address sanitizer issue.
>>
>> Breaks compilation here, how did you test?
>>
>> libavcodec/alsdec.c: In functio
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-11-12 20:05 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
>
>> The attached patch fixes the address sanitizer issue.
>
> Breaks compilation here, how did you test?
>
> libavcodec/alsdec.c: In function ‘decode_var_block_data’:
> libavcodec/alsdec.c:938
2017-11-12 20:05 GMT+01:00 Umair Khan :
> The attached patch fixes the address sanitizer issue.
Breaks compilation here, how did you test?
libavcodec/alsdec.c: In function ‘decode_var_block_data’:
libavcodec/alsdec.c:938:7: error: expected ‘}’ before ‘else’
Carl Eugen
_
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> Am 03.11.17 um 21:13 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
>> On 11/3/17, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
>>> Am 02.11.17 um 21:32 schrieb Umair Khan:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> O
Am 03.11.17 um 21:13 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
> On 11/3/17, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
>> Am 02.11.17 um 21:32 schrieb Umair Khan:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>>> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Umair Khan wrote:
> I tried de
On 11/3/17, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> Am 02.11.17 um 21:32 schrieb Umair Khan:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Umair Khan wrote:
>>>
I tried decoding the file in both the cases and I don't see any
>>
Am 02.11.17 um 21:32 schrieb Umair Khan:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Umair Khan wrote:
>>
>>> I tried decoding the file in both the cases and I don't see any
>>> address related error in the console while dec
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Umair Khan wrote:
>
> > I tried decoding the file in both the cases and I don't see any
> > address related error in the console while decoding. Following is the
> > output after I apply the
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Umair Khan wrote:
> I tried decoding the file in both the cases and I don't see any
> address related error in the console while decoding. Following is the
> output after I apply the patch :-
>
[..]
> Is there something which I'm missing?
>
You need to run
Hi Ronald,
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 12:21 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi Umair,
>
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Umair Khan wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Umair,
>> >
>> > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Umair Khan wrote:
>> >
>> >> I test
Hi Umair,
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Umair Khan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi Umair,
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Umair Khan wrote:
> >
> >> I tested the file which Michael sent. The thing is that I'm getting
> >> error in decoding
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi Umair,
>
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Umair Khan wrote:
>
>> I tested the file which Michael sent. The thing is that I'm getting
>> error in decoding that file in both the cases, with or without the
>> patch. I will begin debuggi
Hi Umair,
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Umair Khan wrote:
> I tested the file which Michael sent. The thing is that I'm getting
> error in decoding that file in both the cases, with or without the
> patch. I will begin debugging this issue, however I think the file
> which Michael sent has go
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Umair Khan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 01:54:27PM +0530, Umair Khan wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> > > On 9/21/17, Umair Khan wrote:
>> > >> Hi
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 01:54:27PM +0530, Umair Khan wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > > On 9/21/17, Umair Khan wrote:
> > >> Hi Ronald,
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Ronald S
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 01:54:27PM +0530, Umair Khan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > On 9/21/17, Umair Khan wrote:
> >> Hi Ronald,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi Umair,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:06 A
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 9/21/17, Umair Khan wrote:
>> Hi Ronald,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Umair,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:06 AM, Umair Khan wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Paul B Mahol
On 9/21/17, Umair Khan wrote:
> Hi Ronald,
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
>> Hi Umair,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:06 AM, Umair Khan wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>>> > On 9/10/17, Umair Khan wrote:
>>> >> On Sun, Sep 1
Hi Ronald,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi Umair,
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:06 AM, Umair Khan wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> > On 9/10/17, Umair Khan wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Thilo Borgmann > >
>> >>
Hi Umair,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:06 AM, Umair Khan wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > On 9/10/17, Umair Khan wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Thilo Borgmann >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> > This patch fixes this bug - https://trac.ffmp
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 9/10/17, Umair Khan wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Thilo Borgmann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> > This patch fixes this bug - https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/5297
>>>
>>> this is yet another iteration of
>>>
>>> http://ffmpeg.
On 9/10/17, Umair Khan wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Thilo Borgmann
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > This patch fixes this bug - https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/5297
>>
>> this is yet another iteration of
>>
>> http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-June/213005.html
>
> I see. I was k
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > This patch fixes this bug - https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/5297
>
> this is yet another iteration of
>
> http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-June/213005.html
I see. I was keepnig reference codec as the source of truth.
Hi,
> This patch fixes this bug - https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/5297
this is yet another iteration of
http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-June/213005.html
-Thilo
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailma
Hi,
This patch fixes this bug - https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/5297
I suggest removing the check because opt_order can be larger
than block_length for the last frames.
I checked this in reference codec as well. opt_order is larger than
block_length for last 2 frames. Hence, I don't think there's
39 matches
Mail list logo