Stefano Sabatini (12024-07-06):
> Can someone elaborate about why .activate is favoured in this case
> (sorry I missed the activate discussion altogether and I cannot graps
> it from the docs)?
I do not know why Paul believes that source filters need to use
activate. It should not be necessary, bu
On date Tuesday 2024-07-02 10:17:26 +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
[...]
> Source filters should use .activate instead.
Can someone elaborate about why .activate is favoured in this case
(sorry I missed the activate discussion altogether and I cannot graps
it from the docs)?
Also, is the direct AVFil
On date Saturday 2024-07-06 12:40:55 +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 11:19 AM Stefano Sabatini wrote:
[...]
> Not interested in your marginal toys or project.
Good, so the next time avoid the rant and save even more time.
___
ffmpeg-
On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 11:19 AM Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Tuesday 2024-07-02 10:17:26 +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > No need for query function.
> > This implementation is so blatantly slow and inefficient that is not
> useful.
> > Source filters should use .activate instead.
> > Many mor
On date Thursday 2024-07-04 17:29:16 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> Tested and working fine. It would be nice if you could add the default
> values to the documentation.
Will do, thanks.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.
On date Tuesday 2024-07-02 10:17:26 +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> No need for query function.
> This implementation is so blatantly slow and inefficient that is not useful.
> Source filters should use .activate instead.
> Many more other issues...
It was pending reviews for more than two weeks.
Ab
Tested and working fine. It would be nice if you could add the default
values to the documentation.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg
No need for query function.
This implementation is so blatantly slow and inefficient that is not useful.
Source filters should use .activate instead.
Many more other issues...
On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 11:52 PM Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Sunday 2024-06-16 17:37:09 +0200, Stefano Sabatini wro
On date Sunday 2024-06-16 17:37:09 +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Thursday 2024-06-13 16:45:48 +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
[...]
> Applied other fixes as well, thanks.
> From 7d9ffbdb8e419ca01e60604038d5534a3ca8ae0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stefano Sabatini
> Date: Mon, 27 May 2
On date Thursday 2024-06-13 16:45:48 +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
> Some documentation nitpicks. Nothing jumped out about the code, but I don't
> know the algorithm well enough to spot anything deep.
>
> > From 9932cfc19500acbd0685eb2cc8fd88e9af3f5dbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Stefano Sab
Some documentation nitpicks. Nothing jumped out about the code, but I don't
know the algorithm well enough to spot anything deep.
> From 9932cfc19500acbd0685eb2cc8fd88e9af3f5dbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stefano Sabatini
> Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 11:19:08 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] lavfi: ad
On date Monday 2024-06-03 11:41:59 +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Tuesday 2024-05-28 18:58:28 +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > On date Monday 2024-05-27 23:37:33 +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > still missing documentation and might be optimized (and maybe extended
On date Tuesday 2024-05-28 18:58:28 +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Monday 2024-05-27 23:37:33 +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > still missing documentation and might be optimized (and maybe extended
> > to support gray16 - this should be simple), comments are welcome.
>
> U
On date Monday 2024-05-27 23:37:33 +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> still missing documentation and might be optimized (and maybe extended
> to support gray16 - this should be simple), comments are welcome.
Updated with documentation.
>From 607459e7a184ab2d111b65f5017fb7f76e3bd58d Mon Sep
14 matches
Mail list logo
