Maksym Veremeyenko (12019-03-10):
> removal code authors should find the core of their hates: either NDI
> technology or NewTek company
Please control your wording. Hate is a toxic irrational emotion.
Fighting companies that produce non-Libre software and want to profit
from the efforts of the Lib
On 10.03.2019 19:04, Martin Vignali wrote:
[...]
The interest of sending a patch to this project is to benefit of the entire
infrastructure around the ffmpeg project.
Not the pleasure to read this mailing list.
Taking time to have a feature/enhancement integrate inside this project,
are interesti
Andrey Semashev (12019-03-10):
> Yes. It doesn't make it less true, IMO.
It makes it neither true nor false but subject to personal judgements.
> I'm pointing out that there seem to be no technical reason for the removal,
> but instead there is a political one.
Indeed.
>
Martin Vignali (12019-03-10):
> It's about the lack of consistency on this topic, and the lack of a clear
> definition (documented at the project level, to avoid precisely this kind
> of situation)
As I said: if there is support for removing ALL non-free stuff, I am
behind it too. Is it clear enou
On 3/10/19 9:39 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
Andrey Semashev (12019-03-10):
But I think decisions like this should be based exclusively on
technical grounds. Political or populist arguments are not valid for
technical decisions, regardless how "good" or aligned with your personal
views
Le dim. 10 mars 2019 à 18:55, Nicolas George a écrit :
> Martin Vignali (12019-03-10):
> > Le dim. 10 mars 2019 à 17:03, Nicolas George a écrit :
> > > It's just ruining his effort to integrate this feature inside the
> project.
>
> Please do not attribute your sentences to me.
>
> > This discus
Andrey Semashev (12019-03-10):
> But I think decisions like this should be based exclusively on
> technical grounds. Political or populist arguments are not valid for
> technical decisions, regardless how "good" or aligned with your personal
> views they might seem.
Do you realize that t
On 3/10/19 8:28 PM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019, at 18:04, Martin Vignali wrote:
This discussion just send bad message to contributors.
You're just encourage them to keep code improvement in their own version of
ffmpeg.
Maintaining an FFmpeg is hard and costly.
This gives t
Martin Vignali (12019-03-10):
> Le dim. 10 mars 2019 à 17:03, Nicolas George a écrit :
> > It's just ruining his effort to integrate this feature inside the project.
Please do not attribute your sentences to me.
> This discussion just send bad message to contributors.
If you consider "we do not
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 1:04 PM Martin Vignali
wrote:
> But if this is the project policy...
>
Yes, I would like to propose to make this project policy.
Ronald
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listi
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019, at 18:04, Martin Vignali wrote:
> This discussion just send bad message to contributors.
> You're just encourage them to keep code improvement in their own version of
> ffmpeg.
Maintaining an FFmpeg is hard and costly.
This gives those people incentives to use open source lib
Le dim. 10 mars 2019 à 17:03, Nicolas George a écrit :
> Maksym Veremeyenko (12019-03-10):
> > code you going to remove was not made by you nor NewTek company.
> >
> > if you have a problem with NewTek company - do a step to solve it - dont
> > ruin a code.
>
> Nobody is ruining any code. Just re
Maksym Veremeyenko (12019-03-10):
> code you going to remove was not made by you nor NewTek company.
>
> if you have a problem with NewTek company - do a step to solve it - dont
> ruin a code.
Nobody is ruining any code. Just removing it from a prominent
distribution and development platform.
Re
On 09.03.2019 22:12, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
They have not responded to any communications:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/7589
code you going to remove was not made by you nor NewTek company.
if you have a problem with NewTek company - do a step to solve it - dont
ruin a code.
--
Maksym Verem
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, at 21:58, Marton Balint wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, Dennis Mungai wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 23:19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2019-03-09 21:16 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos :
>> > 2019-03-09 21:12 GMT+01:00, Kieran Kunhya
Marton Balint (12019-03-09):
> You are not removing ndi because of the license violation, you are removing
> it because you don't like it.
Let us assume, for the rice wine of the argument, that you are right:
that we want to remove it because we do not like them. But ask yourself:
why do we not li
Ronald S. Bultje (12019-03-09):
> I would not be against removing all closed-source support.
I would get behind that.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https:/
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, at 23:58, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 4:02 PM Martin Vignali
> I would not be against removing all closed-source support. I have voiced
> this before in the realvideo discussion:
> https://ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.narkive.com/Ok5y3HXO/patch-0-3-codec-wrapper-for
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, at 21:58, Marton Balint wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, Dennis Mungai wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 23:19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> >> 2019-03-09 21:16 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos :
> >> > 2019-03-09 21:12 GMT+01:00, Kieran Kunhya :
> >> >> They have not responded to any commu
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 4:02 PM Martin Vignali
wrote:
> They have not responded to any communications:
> > https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/7589
> >
> >
> I still do not understand the link between the ticket and the removal of
> lib ndi.
> Is it plan to remove all features used by people who d
They have not responded to any communications:
> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/7589
>
>
I still do not understand the link between the ticket and the removal of
lib ndi.
Is it plan to remove all features used by people who doesn't respect the
licence ?
If this patch concerns the removal of a libr
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, Dennis Mungai wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 23:19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
2019-03-09 21:16 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos :
> 2019-03-09 21:12 GMT+01:00, Kieran Kunhya :
>> They have not responded to any communications:
>> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/7589
>
> Missing min
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 23:19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2019-03-09 21:16 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos :
> > 2019-03-09 21:12 GMT+01:00, Kieran Kunhya :
> >> They have not responded to any communications:
> >> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/7589
> >
> > Missing minor version bump
>
> Sorry about thi
2019-03-09 21:16 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos :
> 2019-03-09 21:12 GMT+01:00, Kieran Kunhya :
>> They have not responded to any communications:
>> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/7589
>
> Missing minor version bump
Sorry about this, I used the wrong patch reading tool...
> and please also post a ne
2019-03-09 21:12 GMT+01:00, Kieran Kunhya :
> They have not responded to any communications:
> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/7589
Missing minor version bump and please also post
a news entry.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg
They have not responded to any communications:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/7589
Kieran
0001-lavd-Remove-libndi_newtek.patch
Description: Binary data
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-dev
26 matches
Mail list logo
