On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 01:48:51AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 05:13:11PM -0600, ill wrote:
> > The patch that caligula sent works. I tested it on the git from
> > yesterday and firefox is now able to read the jpg ffserver output
> > properly with that applied.
> > T
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 05:13:11PM -0600, ill wrote:
> The patch that caligula sent works. I tested it on the git from
> yesterday and firefox is now able to read the jpg ffserver output
> properly with that applied.
> The only difference is that I added an enter on line 26 because it
> was two lin
The patch that caligula sent works. I tested it on the git from
yesterday and firefox is now able to read the jpg ffserver output
properly with that applied.
The only difference is that I added an enter on line 26 because it was
two lines into one. Can it be committed now?
diff -Nrup ffmpeg-
Who is in charge of committing the patches? This patch fixes bugs, so I
don't see why it should be ignored.
Ave all
Background:
I'm using ffserver, which feeds of a webcam, to serve .swf and .jpg
files.
To serve the .jpg files, I use the patch mentioned in
http://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail
So can this be applied to ffserver and put in the git?
Ave all
Background:
I'm using ffserver, which feeds of a webcam, to serve .swf and .jpg
files.
To serve the .jpg files, I use the patch mentioned in
http://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2006-June/013107.html
Over the years I
Ave all
Background:
I'm using ffserver, which feeds of a webcam, to serve .swf and .jpg files.
To serve the .jpg files, I use the patch mentioned in
http://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2006-June/013107.html
Over the years I "ported" the patch to more current versions of ffmpeg.
Atta
There was a patch to fix this, but I don't think it was ever applied:
http://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2006-June/013107.html
Did you test the patch?
Carl Eugen
No. I don't know if it works and don't really know how to apply it. It's
also a bit old.
_
ill gmail.com> writes:
> There was a patch to fix this, but I don't think it was ever applied:
> http://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2006-June/013107.html
Did you test the patch?
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpe
The jpg output plugin is outputting a stream (with no mimetype) instead
of an image file, so browsers like firefox can't view it properly and
try to download it or try to grab the never ending stream instead of
just a single image.
There was a patch to fix this, but I don't think it was ever a
