06.07.2016, 09:20, "Jean-Baptiste Kempf" :
> On 06 Jul, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote :
>> > A custom script is not a common build system tool.
>>
>> How configure.ac that gets fed into autotools etc is acceptable and
>> configure is not is beyond me.
>> As for their meaning, I don't know.
On 06 Jul, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote :
> > A custom script is not a common build system tool.
>
> How configure.ac that gets fed into autotools etc is acceptable and configure
> is not is beyond me.
> As for their meaning, I don't know.
Ask them. But, even if your configure is good, it's not a c
06.07.2016, 08:51, "Jean-Baptiste Kempf" :
> On 06 Jul, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote :
>> > But, you could at least be a bit more truthful when filling it:
>> > - the buildsystem is not common tools, since you have your own
>> > configure (it's a SUGGESTED thing anyway)
>>
>> As far as I
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On 06 Jul, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote :
>> > But, you could at least be a bit more truthful when filling it:
>> > - the buildsystem is not common tools, since you have your own
>> >configure (it's a SUGGESTED thing anyway)
>>
>> As fa
On 06 Jul, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote :
> > But, you could at least be a bit more truthful when filling it:
> > - the buildsystem is not common tools, since you have your own
> > configure (it's a SUGGESTED thing anyway)
>
> As far as I know, shell script is a common tool available on POSIX plat
06.07.2016, 07:48, "Jean-Baptiste Kempf" :
> On 04 Jul, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote :
>> https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/.
>
> Tbh, this is pure BS/PR, as we've seen for VLC. But why not...
>
> But, you could at least be a bit more truthful when filling it:
> - the buildsystem is not
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 07:18:08AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> 06.07.2016, 04:03, "Carl Eugen Hoyos" :
> > Ganesh Ajjanagadde mit.edu> writes:
> >
> >> > No question, it would be better if tests would be added quicker ...
> >>
> >> I do not doubt this, but at the moment we do not enforce
On 04 Jul, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote :
> https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/.
Tbh, this is pure BS/PR, as we've seen for VLC. But why not...
But, you could at least be a bit more truthful when filling it:
- the buildsystem is not common tools, since you have your own
configure (it's
06.07.2016, 04:03, "Carl Eugen Hoyos" :
> Ganesh Ajjanagadde mit.edu> writes:
>
>> > No question, it would be better if tests would be added quicker ...
>>
>> I do not doubt this, but at the moment we do not enforce it.
>> Do you see any trouble in enforcing this requirement from
>> major rele
Michael Niedermayer niedermayer.cc> writes:
> thus i do not think this point is about any gurantees or future
So I misunderstood.
Thank you, Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-de
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 08:02:55AM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Ganesh Ajjanagadde mit.edu> writes:
>
> > > No question, it would be better if tests would be added quicker ...
> >
> > I do not doubt this, but at the moment we do not enforce it.
> > Do you see any trouble in enforcing this re
Ganesh Ajjanagadde mit.edu> writes:
> > No question, it would be better if tests would be added quicker ...
>
> I do not doubt this, but at the moment we do not enforce it.
> Do you see any trouble in enforcing this requirement from
> major release to next major release?
I am against adding su
05.07.2016, 18:03, "Michael Niedermayer" :
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 05:45:19PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> 05.07.2016, 17:29, "Michael Niedermayer" :
>> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 09:15:27PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> >> 04.07.2016, 15:55, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
>> >>
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 05:45:19PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> 05.07.2016, 17:29, "Michael Niedermayer" :
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 09:15:27PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> 04.07.2016, 15:55, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Ganesh
05.07.2016, 17:29, "Michael Niedermayer" :
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 09:15:27PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> 04.07.2016, 15:55, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> 04.07.2016, 15:36, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 09:15:27PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> 04.07.2016, 15:55, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >
> >> 04.07.2016, 15:36, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:
05.07.2016, 08:16, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
[...]
>> > [..]
>> >
>> >> 4. If the project software is an application or library, and its
>> primary
>> >> purpose is not to implement cryptography,
>> >> then it SHOULD only call on software specifically designed to implement
>> >> cryptographic f
05.07.2016, 08:22, "Hendrik Leppkes" :
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
[...]
>>>
>>> [..]
>>>
4. If the project software is an application or library, and its primary
purpose is not to implement cryptography,
then it SHOULD only call on software sp
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> 04.07.2016, 22:59, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>>
04.07.2016, 15:55, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
> Hi,
>>
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> 04.07.2016, 22:59, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>
>>> 04.07.2016, 15:55, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> 04.07.2016, 22:59, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
> >
> >> 04.07.2016, 15:55, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Ganes
04.07.2016, 22:59, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>
>> 04.07.2016, 15:55, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> 04.07.2016, 15:36, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
>> >>
Am 04.07.16 um 21:29 schrieb Ganesh Ajjanagadde:
> 04.07.2016, 10:33, "Clément Bœsch" :
>> On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 at 13:41 Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/.
>>>
>>> Thoughts on getting this done for FFmpeg?
>>
>> Any thing we need to adjus
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> 04.07.2016, 15:55, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
> >
> >> 04.07.2016, 15:36, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:29 PM,
04.07.2016, 15:55, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>
>> 04.07.2016, 15:36, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> 04.07.2016, 10:33, "Clément Bœsch" :
On Mon, 04 Jul 2016 15:44:35 -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> True. At the moment, it seems like the relevant forms can be filled
> in directly from existing information, and no changes are necessary.
I didn't read all of the criteria [1], but if any changes are needed
feel free to send a patch
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>
>
> 04.07.2016, 15:36, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
> >
> >> 04.07.2016, 10:33, "Clément Bœsch" :
> >> > On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 at 13:41 Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> >> wr
04.07.2016, 15:36, "Ronald S. Bultje" :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>
>> 04.07.2016, 10:33, "Clément Bœsch" :
>> > On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 at 13:41 Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/.
>> >>
>
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> 04.07.2016, 10:33, "Clément Bœsch" :
> > On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 at 13:41 Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/.
> >>
> >> Thoughts on getting this done for FFmpeg?
> >
> >
04.07.2016, 10:33, "Clément Bœsch" :
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 at 13:41 Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/.
>>
>> Thoughts on getting this done for FFmpeg?
>
> Any thing we need to adjust in the project? I don't see much things to
> change by l
On 7/4/2016 11:33 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 at 13:41 Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/.
>>
>> Thoughts on getting this done for FFmpeg?
>
> Any thing we need to adjust in the project? I don't see much things to
> change by loo
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 at 13:41 Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/.
>
> Thoughts on getting this done for FFmpeg?
Any thing we need to adjust in the project? I don't see much things to
change by looking at https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/pro
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 at 13:41 Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/.
>
> Thoughts on getting this done for FFmpeg?
>
>
> That would imply this project could act like adults. We are centuries away
from that.
Kieran
Hi,
https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/.
Thoughts on getting this done for FFmpeg?
Regards,
Ganesh
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
34 matches
Mail list logo