On 11-5-2017 13:56, Stephen Hutchinson wrote:
> On 5/11/2017 7:43 AM, Reino Wijnsma wrote:
>> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6377#comment:2:
>>> Inadequate for building FFPlay, yes. But perhaps not for other
>>> software.
>>> Are there any downsides to my proposition?
>> I could of course contact
On 5/11/2017 7:43 AM, Reino Wijnsma wrote:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6377#comment:2:
Inadequate for building FFPlay, yes. But perhaps not for other software.
Are there any downsides to my proposition?
I could of course contact the sdl2 developers, but when 'sdl2-config'
already has the li
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6377#comment:2:
> Inadequate for building FFPlay, yes. But perhaps not for other software.
> Are there any downsides to my proposition?
I could of course contact the sdl2 developers, but when 'sdl2-config'
already has the librarylist setup right to build FFPlay, why
On Thu, 11 May 2017 12:53:33 +0200
Reino Wijnsma wrote:
> See https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6377.
> By prioritizing the 'sdl2-config'-check the librarylist that's needed to
> build FFPlay is setup automatically and one doesn't have to patch
> 'sdl2.pc' anymore.
Wouldn't it be more appropriate t
See https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6377.
By prioritizing the 'sdl2-config'-check the librarylist that's needed to
build FFPlay is setup automatically and one doesn't have to patch
'sdl2.pc' anymore.
From 3f9c065f96815ffefaa39cda7bacd8132bfdf66c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Reino Wijnsma
Date: We
