Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Swresample strangeness

2024-02-25 Thread Marton Balint
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024, Michael Niedermayer wrote: On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 05:38:27PM +0100, Marton Balint wrote: Hi, I am working on a patch to select a better default packet size for the wav demuxer, since it reads at most 4096 bytes which can cause insanely small packets for files with high

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Swresample strangeness

2024-02-25 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 05:38:27PM +0100, Marton Balint wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on a patch to select a better default packet size for the wav > demuxer, since it reads at most 4096 bytes which can cause insanely small > packets for files with high channel count. > > Unfortunately some swres

[FFmpeg-devel] Swresample strangeness

2024-02-25 Thread Marton Balint
Hi, I am working on a patch to select a better default packet size for the wav demuxer, since it reads at most 4096 bytes which can cause insanely small packets for files with high channel count. Unfortunately some swresample fate tests blew up, and I wonder if the result of the resampling s