Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Sending patch to FFMPEG

2021-08-25 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 4:58 AM Jan Poonthong wrote: > Makes sense, but there is no mentioning of nasm is recommended . Is there > any down side of --disable x86? > Yes, big one. > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 2:12 AM Lynne wrote: > > > 5 Aug 2021, 21:05 by janpoonthong...@gmail.com: > > > > > If

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Sending patch to FFMPEG

2021-08-25 Thread Jan Poonthong
Makes sense, but there is no mentioning of nasm is recommended . Is there any down side of --disable x86? On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 2:12 AM Lynne wrote: > 5 Aug 2021, 21:05 by janpoonthong...@gmail.com: > > > If I'm missing something, please let me know. > > > > We've recommended nasm instead of y

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Sending patch to FFMPEG

2021-08-25 Thread Lynne
5 Aug 2021, 21:05 by janpoonthong...@gmail.com: > If I'm missing something, please let me know. > We've recommended nasm instead of yasm for years now. You don't need to have nasm installed to compile, you can disable assembly optimizations. configure even tells you how, and forces you to in case

[FFmpeg-devel] Sending patch to FFMPEG

2021-08-25 Thread Jan Poonthong
If I'm missing something, please let me know. 0001-Include-missing-documentation-for-yasm-in-INSTALL.md.patch Description: Binary data ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe