On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 03:53:43PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12020-09-22):
> > You have not shown the filtergraph that have issues with my patch.
> > And upon constant request to show it, you just ignore such polite
> > requests.
> >
> > I have right to immediatelly revert your
Paul B Mahol (12020-09-22):
> You have not shown the filtergraph that have issues with my patch.
> And upon constant request to show it, you just ignore such polite
> requests.
>
> I have right to immediatelly revert your revert.
You had no right to push in the first place.
signature.asc
Descri
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:46:49PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12020-09-22):
> > Show the filtergraph that have issues with my patch.
> >
> > Otherwise I will revert your commit.
> > I have right to do it.
>
> You had no right to push in the first place. You have no right to push
Paul B Mahol (12020-09-22):
> Show the filtergraph that have issues with my patch.
>
> Otherwise I will revert your commit.
> I have right to do it.
You had no right to push in the first place. You have no right to push
again now.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:48:45AM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12020-09-20):
> > If I not receive reply within 96h I will push revert.
>
> You had no right to push in the first place. You have no right to push
> again now.
Show the filtergraph that have issues with my patch.
Oth
Paul B Mahol (12020-09-20):
> If I not receive reply within 96h I will push revert.
You had no right to push in the first place. You have no right to push
again now.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinf
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 03:28:06PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12020-09-08):
> > It was reviewed on IRC. Nobody complained about it.
>
> Show the relevant excerpt of log. Non-trivial reviews should happen on
> the mailing-list anyway.
>
> > The explanation in commit log is very c
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:44:11PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste Kempf (12020-09-08):
> > I think the explanation is quite aggressive and has absolutely nothing
> > to do inside a git log, to be honest.
> >
> > The fact that you disagree on the commit is fine, but being passive
> >
Jean-Baptiste Kempf (12020-09-08):
> I think the explanation is quite aggressive and has absolutely nothing
> to do inside a git log, to be honest.
>
> The fact that you disagree on the commit is fine, but being passive
> aggressive on a commit log is not OK, in my humble opinion. Especially
> whe
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020, at 15:17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12020-09-08):
> > Nicolas George reverted one of my reviewed commits without proper
> > explanation why it is faulty.
>
> The explanation is in the commit message, and your patch was not
> reviewed and you should never have pushed
Paul B Mahol (12020-09-08):
> It was reviewed on IRC. Nobody complained about it.
Show the relevant excerpt of log. Non-trivial reviews should happen on
the mailing-list anyway.
> The explanation in commit log is very cryptic.
I do not owe you my time. All the information is there. Ask specific
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 03:17:15PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12020-09-08):
> > Nicolas George reverted one of my reviewed commits without proper
> > explanation why it is faulty.
>
> The explanation is in the commit message, and your patch was not
> reviewed and you should never
Paul B Mahol (12020-09-08):
> Nicolas George reverted one of my reviewed commits without proper
> explanation why it is faulty.
The explanation is in the commit message, and your patch was not
reviewed and you should never have pushed it in the first place.
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
De
Hi,
Nicolas George reverted one of my reviewed commits without proper explanation
why it
is faulty.
I kindly ask Nicolas George to review this patch
and explain what is wrong with it.
If not, I will be forced to either revert this revert or take more
actions to Technical Committee.
Regards.
__
14 matches
Mail list logo
