On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 5:49 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> dont all modern OS assign physical memory only once something is stored
> in these tables?
>
This seems to be correct. I was misreading the tooling which indicated
these were taking up size. So this patch can be abandoned. Sorry for the
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 04:50:57PM -0700, Dale Curtis wrote:
> These tables represent ~70k so moving the allocation to when
> they're actually used reduces memory usage in cases where the
> h264 decoder isn't used.
> h264_cavlc.c | 43 ++-
> 1 file change
On 9/7/2018 8:50 PM, Dale Curtis wrote:
> These tables represent ~70k so moving the allocation to when
> they're actually used reduces memory usage in cases where the
> h264 decoder isn't used.
>
>
> cavlc-size.patch
>
>
> From e1cbe52a1f41a39698136efb4695d8d019117853 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>
2018-09-08 1:50 GMT+02:00, Dale Curtis :
> These tables represent ~70k so moving the allocation to when
> they're actually used reduces memory usage in cases where the
> h264 decoder isn't used.
Is there a performance penalty?
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-deve
These tables represent ~70k so moving the allocation to when
they're actually used reduces memory usage in cases where the
h264 decoder isn't used.
From e1cbe52a1f41a39698136efb4695d8d019117853 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dale Curtis
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:50:23 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Reduce
