On 02/27/2016 12:02 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 11:51 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 11:44 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
Michael, I am currently "assuming" that the size of the palette in a
packet, if included at the end of the video data, will be 1 <<
bits_per_coded_sample. You'r
On 02/27/2016 11:51 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 11:44 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
Michael, I am currently "assuming" that the size of the palette in a
packet, if included at the end of the video data, will be 1 <<
bits_per_coded_sample. You're saying that the size of the packet isn't
fix
On 02/27/2016 11:44 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
Michael, I am currently "assuming" that the size of the palette in a
packet, if included at the end of the video data, will be 1 <<
bits_per_coded_sample. You're saying that the size of the packet isn't
fixed to 1024 bytes, but currently it seems to be
Michael, I am currently "assuming" that the size of the palette in a
packet, if included at the end of the video data, will be 1 <<
bits_per_coded_sample. You're saying that the size of the packet isn't
fixed to 1024 bytes, but currently it seems to be 1024 (256 * 4) bytes
exclusively. Will thi
