On 02/18/2016 12:45 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
L'octidi 28 pluviôse, an CCXXIV, Nicolas George a écrit :
There may
have been cases where forgetting distclean would cause bugs more subtle than
that, but I do not remember the specif
L'octidi 28 pluviôse, an CCXXIV, Nicolas George a écrit :
> There may
> have been cases where forgetting distclean would cause bugs more subtle than
> that, but I do not remember the specifics.
Just found one: .d files contained the
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> L'octidi 28 pluviôse, an CCXXIV, Mats Peterson a écrit :
> > Is it very important to use a "make distclean" after a "git pull"? It
> > depends on the changes made to the newly pulled code, I guess.
>
> Exactly. The most common issue i
On 02/16/2016 05:37 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
L'octidi 28 pluviôse, an CCXXIV, Mats Peterson a écrit :
Is it very important to use a "make distclean" after a "git pull"? It
depends on the changes made to the newly pulled code, I guess.
Exactly. The most common issue is when files are renamed o
L'octidi 28 pluviôse, an CCXXIV, Mats Peterson a écrit :
> Is it very important to use a "make distclean" after a "git pull"? It
> depends on the changes made to the newly pulled code, I guess.
Exactly. The most common issue is when files are renamed or deleted: without
distclean, the dependency f
Is it very important to use a "make distclean" after a "git pull"? It
depends on the changes made to the newly pulled code, I guess.
Mats
--
Mats Peterson
http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ff
