On 26-05-2019 10:32 PM, Gyan wrote:
On 26-05-2019 10:08 PM, Werner Robitza wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 6:09 PM Gyan wrote:
Do you want to update it for all algorithms with missing parameter
details?
Not at this stage – would be a lot of guesswork since I didn't
implement the filters. A
On 26-05-2019 10:08 PM, Werner Robitza wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 6:09 PM Gyan wrote:
Do you want to update it for all algorithms with missing parameter details?
Not at this stage – would be a lot of guesswork since I didn't
implement the filters. Also, at least from research I've seen,
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 6:09 PM Gyan wrote:
> Do you want to update it for all algorithms with missing parameter details?
Not at this stage – would be a lot of guesswork since I didn't
implement the filters. Also, at least from research I've seen, the
Lanczos parameter seems to be used often with
On 26-05-2019 09:23 PM, Werner Robitza wrote:
> From 2f91dfe64e41edcdcc8ba28e37b711106b640a05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Werner Robitza
> Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 17:52:00 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] doc/swscaler: explain default Lanczos parameter
>
> Explain that the default Lanczos filter p
0001-doc-swscaler-explain-default-Lanczos-parameter.patch
Description: Binary data
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@f
