On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, at 21:50, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> no more replies against, so we shift the time to 15:00 UTC (7:00 US West,
> 16:00
> Berlin/London/Paris, 23:00 Peking).
>
> Happening at #ffmpeg-meeting.
This is in 1 hour, now.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
_
Hi,
we haven't had a meeting for quite some time and are beyond schedule anyway. So
I'd propose having another developer meeting before end of year.
Please give your preferences for a date here:
https://framadate.org/g1FPmOpfEz9mSLg9
one week later, we have settled for having the FFDev meeti
Am 19.11.20 um 06:01 schrieb Steven Liu:
>
>
>> 2020年11月19日 下午12:05，Zane van Iperen 写道：
>>
>>
>>
>> On 19/11/20 1:46 pm, Steven Liu wrote:
2020年11月18日 下午8:59，Thilo Borgmann 写道：
Hi,
> we haven't had a meeting for quite some time and are beyond schedule
> anyway. So I
> 2020年11月19日 下午12:05，Zane van Iperen 写道：
>
>
>
> On 19/11/20 1:46 pm, Steven Liu wrote:
>>> 2020年11月18日 下午8:59，Thilo Borgmann 写道：
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
we haven't had a meeting for quite some time and are beyond schedule
anyway. So I'd propose having another developer meeting before
On 19/11/20 1:46 pm, Steven Liu wrote:
2020年11月18日 下午8:59，Thilo Borgmann 写道：
Hi,
we haven't had a meeting for quite some time and are beyond schedule anyway. So
I'd propose having another developer meeting before end of year.
Please give your preferences for a date here:
https://framad
> 2020年11月18日 下午8:59，Thilo Borgmann 写道：
>
> Hi,
>
>> we haven't had a meeting for quite some time and are beyond schedule anyway.
>> So I'd propose having another developer meeting before end of year.
>>
>> Please give your preferences for a date here:
>> https://framadate.org/g1FPmOpfEz9mSL
Hi,
> we haven't had a meeting for quite some time and are beyond schedule anyway.
> So I'd propose having another developer meeting before end of year.
>
> Please give your preferences for a date here:
> https://framadate.org/g1FPmOpfEz9mSLg9
one week later, we have settled for having the FFDe
Ronald S. Bultje (12020-11-11):
> > Also, I believe it would be good for us internally, since it would
> > - allow other libraries to do IO cleanly without depending on lavf
> > - force us to clean up avio public API, which is not in a great shape
>
> Avio public API would be great, regardless of
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 10:45 AM Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting James Almer (2020-11-11 14:13:07)
> > I don't recall anything about splitting IO, but what does it achieve
> > beyond making lavf lighter? Are there users out there that could care
> > about linking to an hypothetical lavio whil
Nov 11, 2020, 12:20 by thilo.borgm...@mail.de:
> Hi,
>
> we haven't had a meeting for quite some time and are beyond schedule anyway.
> So I'd propose having another developer meeting before end of year.
>
> Please give your preferences for a date here:
> https://framadate.org/g1FPmOpfEz9mSLg9
>
Absolutely disagree, please leave.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 5:21 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12020-11-11):
> > Sounds like a good topic to discuss at a developer meeting!
>
> No, that's precisely not, this is the kind of topic that needs
> paragraphs, not lines.
>
> Regards,
>
>
Vittorio Giovara (12020-11-11):
> Sounds like a good topic to discuss at a developer meeting!
No, that's precisely not, this is the kind of topic that needs
paragraphs, not lines.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 4:52 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Anton Khirnov (12020-11-11):
> > I gave you arguments last time this was discussed. You keep ignoring
> > them,
>
> I did not ignore them, I replied to them, by pointing to you that there
> are better ways to achieve the things in your argum
Am Mi., 11. Nov. 2020 um 16:49 Uhr schrieb Anton Khirnov :
> I gave you arguments last time this was discussed. You keep ignoring
> them, because presumably you are the sole arbiter of what is actual and
> practical.
I am not convinced that you are in an ideal position for personal attacks.
Carl
Anton Khirnov (12020-11-11):
> I gave you arguments last time this was discussed. You keep ignoring
> them,
I did not ignore them, I replied to them, by pointing to you that there
are better ways to achieve the things in your arguments.
> because presumably you are the sole arbiter of what
Quoting Nicolas George (2020-11-11 15:05:35)
> What about the people who want to keep the libs separate give actual
> practical arguments?
I gave you arguments last time this was discussed. You keep ignoring
them, because presumably you are the sole arbiter of what is actual and
practical.
I am n
Quoting James Almer (2020-11-11 14:13:07)
> On 11/11/2020 10:05 AM, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> > Am 11.11.20 um 14:04 schrieb Thilo Borgmann:
> >> Am 11.11.20 um 13:01 schrieb Steven Liu:
> >>> Thilo Borgmann 于2020年11月11日周三 下午7:20写道：
>
> Hi,
>
> we haven't had a meeting for quite
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 11:20, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> Current agenda proposals, feel free to add to it:
>
I would like to propose FFmpeg/SPI purchase a Mac Mini ARM machine for
development (and FATE if required).
Obviously this will be an important platform in the coming years.
Kieran
_
Steven Liu (12020-11-11):
> What about make and option in configure and let the option be choosed by
> users?
It is the worst of the two options combined, with extra drawbacks: we
still have to deal with all the avpriv nonsense, and we get to maintain
both systems.
What about the people who want
Steven Liu 于2020年11月11日周三 下午9:29写道：
>
> Nicolas George 于2020年11月11日周三 下午9:20写道：
> >
> > James Almer (12020-11-11):
> > > What i know we were discussing was to merge lavd into lavf, since their
> > > current dependency state is pretty hacky and makes development and
> > > extension
> > > of certa
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020, at 14:20, Nicolas George wrote:
> In fact, nothing should be on a developers meeting agenda that has not
> already been extensively discussed on the list.
Absolutely totally disagree.
A meeting is here to discuss about things. Including things not on the agenda.
By discussin
Nicolas George 于2020年11月11日周三 下午9:20写道：
>
> James Almer (12020-11-11):
> > What i know we were discussing was to merge lavd into lavf, since their
> > current dependency state is pretty hacky and makes development and extension
> > of certain lavf public structs a pain.
> > It's why i didn't apply
James Almer (12020-11-11):
> What i know we were discussing was to merge lavd into lavf, since their
> current dependency state is pretty hacky and makes development and extension
> of certain lavf public structs a pain.
> It's why i didn't apply my iterate api set just yet.
>
> I don't recall any
Am 11.11.20 um 14:13 schrieb James Almer:
> On 11/11/2020 10:05 AM, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
>> Am 11.11.20 um 14:04 schrieb Thilo Borgmann:
>>> Am 11.11.20 um 13:01 schrieb Steven Liu:
Thilo Borgmann 于2020年11月11日周三 下午7:20写道：
>
> Hi,
>
> we haven't had a meeting for quite some ti
On 11/11/2020 10:05 AM, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
Am 11.11.20 um 14:04 schrieb Thilo Borgmann:
Am 11.11.20 um 13:01 schrieb Steven Liu:
Thilo Borgmann 于2020年11月11日周三 下午7:20写道：
Hi,
we haven't had a meeting for quite some time and are beyond schedule anyway. So
I'd propose having another develop
Am 11.11.20 um 14:04 schrieb Thilo Borgmann:
> Am 11.11.20 um 13:01 schrieb Steven Liu:
>> Thilo Borgmann 于2020年11月11日周三 下午7:20写道：
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we haven't had a meeting for quite some time and are beyond schedule
>>> anyway. So I'd propose having another developer meeting before end of yea
Am 11.11.20 um 13:01 schrieb Steven Liu:
> Thilo Borgmann 于2020年11月11日周三 下午7:20写道：
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we haven't had a meeting for quite some time and are beyond schedule anyway.
>> So I'd propose having another developer meeting before end of year.
>>
>> Please give your preferences for a date here
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 1:08 PM Steven Liu wrote:
> Thilo Borgmann 于2020年11月11日周三 下午7:20写道：
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > we haven't had a meeting for quite some time and are beyond schedule
> anyway. So I'd propose having another developer meeting before end of year.
> >
> > Please give your preferences
Thilo Borgmann 于2020年11月11日周三 下午7:20写道：
>
> Hi,
>
> we haven't had a meeting for quite some time and are beyond schedule anyway.
> So I'd propose having another developer meeting before end of year.
>
> Please give your preferences for a date here:
> https://framadate.org/g1FPmOpfEz9mSLg9
>
> Cur
Hi,
we haven't had a meeting for quite some time and are beyond schedule anyway. So
I'd propose having another developer meeting before end of year.
Please give your preferences for a date here:
https://framadate.org/g1FPmOpfEz9mSLg9
Current agenda proposals, feel free to add to it:
- Tech / C
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, at 00:22, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> will do our next meeting, Monday 9 December 2019, at 17:00
> Berlin/Paris/Brussels time.
>
> The time is selected so that people in China and in South America can join us.
>
> It will be online, with live comments/discussion on IRC.
Se
Hello Folks,
Following the previous discussions, and the decisions taken during the last IRL
meeting, summarized here:
https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2019-November/253153.html we will do
our next meeting, Monday 9 December 2019, at 17:00 Berlin/Paris/Brussels time.
The time is select
32 matches
Mail list logo
