Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct

2024-04-17 Thread James Almer
On 4/17/2024 4:43 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: On 4/17/2024 8:33 PM, James Almer wrote: This was an unnecessary personal attack, please don't do that again. Repeat offense may result in temporary bans on the mailinglist and/or IRC. Please keep it civil. That does not make it untrue, however.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct

2024-04-17 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
On 4/17/2024 8:33 PM, James Almer wrote: >>> This was an unnecessary personal attack, please don't do that again. Repeat >>> offense may result in temporary bans on the mailinglist and/or IRC. Please >>> keep it civil. >> >> That does not make it untrue, however. > > It's ok to have opinions. But

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct

2024-04-17 Thread James Almer
On 4/17/2024 4:30 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: On 4/17/2024 8:00 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: This was an unnecessary personal attack, please don't do that again. Repeat offense may result in temporary bans on the mailinglist and/or IRC. Please keep it civil. That does not make it untrue, howeve

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct

2024-04-17 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
On 4/17/2024 8:00 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > This was an unnecessary personal attack, please don't do that again. Repeat > offense may result in temporary bans on the mailinglist and/or IRC. Please > keep it civil. That does not make it untrue, however. I would have preferred a ban. - Derek _

[FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct (was: [EXT] Re: Query from Reuters on XZ, open source, and Microsoft)

2024-04-17 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Nicolas, On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:41 AM Nicolas George wrote: > This, sadly, your ilk has the power to enforce. > Some CC members believe it would be helpful for you (and maybe to others) if we explicitly laid out some ground rules more explicitly, so let us try: - you are entitled to any opin

[FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct (was: FFmpeg table at NAB)

2024-04-17 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Derek, On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 9:50 AM Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > I assume Thilo was hung over, and thus not on the booth. > > It is a disgrace. > This was an unnecessary personal attack, please don't do that again. Repeat offense may result in temporary bans on the mailinglist and/or IRC. Pleas

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct [was: Re: [PATCH] lavc: remove the QOA decoder]

2023-12-27 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 12:53 AM James Almer wrote: > > On 12/26/2023 7:40 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 11:20 PM Ronald S. Bultje > > wrote: > > > >> Paul, > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> > >>> Say what serious feature you contributed ?

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct [was: Re: [PATCH] lavc: remove the QOA decoder]

2023-12-26 Thread James Almer
On 12/26/2023 7:40 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 11:20 PM Ronald S. Bultje wrote: Paul, On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: Say what serious feature you contributed ? - Nothing. the CC requests that you please refrain from attacking fellow FFmpeg contr

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct [was: Re: [PATCH] lavc: remove the QOA decoder]

2023-12-26 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 11:20 PM Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Paul, > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > Say what serious feature you contributed ? - Nothing. > > > > the CC requests that you please refrain from attacking fellow FFmpeg > contributors ("what serious feature

[FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct [was: Re: [PATCH] lavc: remove the QOA decoder]

2023-12-26 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Paul, On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > Say what serious feature you contributed ? - Nothing. > the CC requests that you please refrain from attacking fellow FFmpeg contributors ("what serious feature [have] you contributed? - Nothing") on the mailinglist. Signed unanimousl

[FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct [was: Re: [PATCH] lavc: remove the QOA decoder]

2023-12-26 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi Nicolas, On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:31 PM Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12023-12-21): > > Say what serious feature you contributed ? - Nothing. > > I did not want to say it, but since it is now in the open: Not nothing: > negative. His naysaying discouraged me from working further on t

[FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct [was: [RFC] fftools/ffmpeg and libavdevice/sdl issue]

2023-12-13 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi Nicolas, On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 1:04 PM Nicolas George wrote: > But do not expect it to be fixed, they have hated lavd for ever and now > they have all the control. > Your message promotes conspiracy theories ("they have all control", "they have hated lavd for ever", etc.) and suggests that