L'octidi 28 messidor, an CCXXII, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> again, i suspect this is not updated by filters currently
You are right, the filters do not update them currently.
I believe changing that policy would not be a convenient way of solving that
issue: the duration information raises c
Hi,
- Mail original -
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:40:35PM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Mail original -
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I had a look at https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3052.
> > > The issue is that the last frame duration is lost. Is there any
> > > reason why t
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:40:35PM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote:
>
>
> - Mail original -
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had a look at https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3052.
> > The issue is that the last frame duration is lost. Is there any
> > reason why the packet duration is not transmitted from the de
- Mail original -
> Hi,
>
> I had a look at https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3052.
> The issue is that the last frame duration is lost. Is there any
> reason why the packet duration is not transmitted from the demuxer
> to the muxer?
> Attached is a dumb patch, just to understand a bit mor
Hi,
I had a look at https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3052.
The issue is that the last frame duration is lost. Is there any reason why the
packet duration is not transmitted from the demuxer to the muxer?
Attached is a dumb patch, just to understand a bit more why things are done the
way they are..
