> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of softworkz .
> Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2025 16:14
> To: Kieran Kunhya
> Cc: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview
>
>
>
> >
> > From: Kieran Kunhya
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2025 16:07
> > To: softworkz .
> > Cc: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 22 May 2025, 15:03 softwo
c: Kieran Kunhya
> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview
> >
> > > I really wonder how Kieran can't be embarrassed trying such maneuvers
> which
> > > are so obvious to everybody.
> >
> > I really wonder how you can't be emb
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Kieran
> Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2025 14:46
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Cc: Kieran Kunhya
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview
>
> I really wonder how Kieran can't be embarrassed trying such maneuvers which
> are so obvious to everybody.
I really wonder how you can't be embarrassed sending what imo is the
worst patchset in the history of the project.
Instead of acknowledging that, it's deflecting and playing the victim
you
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 12:24 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> 4. "seeing the scale of memory leaks." try to compare this to
>IAMF "git log --grep IAMF --oneline", IAMF is after a year still receiving
>frequent security fixes. This is just as a comparission
This is completely different, on
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Michael
> Niedermayer
> Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2025 13:24
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview
>
> Hi Kieran
>
> On Thu, Ma
Hi Kieran
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 08:21:48AM +0100, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> It's obvious basic testing was not done on this patchset seeing the scale
> of memory leaks.
>
> I would like the TC to decide on reverting and proper resubmission later.
Iam not speaking for the TC here
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of softworkz .
> Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2025 10:13
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Cc: Kieran Kunhya ; t...@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Nicolas
> George
> Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2025 10:50
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview
>
> Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel (
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Nicolas
> George
> Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2025 10:50
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview
>
> Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel (
Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel (HE12025-05-22):
> It's obvious basic testing was not done on this patchset seeing the scale
> of memory leaks.
>
> I would like the TC to decide on reverting and proper resubmission later.
For once, I agree with that assessment. I think giving softworkz the
authori
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Kieran
> Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2025 09:22
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Cc: Kieran Kunhya ; t...@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patch
peg-devel On Behalf Of
> softworkz .
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2025 22:20
> > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From
Hi,
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 4:00 AM Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
wrote:
> Can we just revert the whole set until it's cleaned up properly?
>
> There are more patches to fix issues than the set itself. This is
> understandable if it's a bit architectural change like threading but it's
> not.
I
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of softworkz .
> Sent: Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2025 22:20
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Kyle Swanson
> Sent: Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2025 22:11
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 4:00
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Kieran
> Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> Sent: Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2025 13:00
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Cc: Kieran Kunhya
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview
>
>
On Wed, 21 May 2025, 01:45 softworkz .,
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thanks again to all for the patches. I figured it might be a bit difficult
> to
> keep track of what has already been submitted and fixed and is still
> pending, and I'm sorry that there has been some duplicate effort to fix the
> same t
Hello,
thanks again to all for the patches. I figured it might be a bit difficult to
keep track of what has already been submitted and fixed and is still
pending, and I'm sorry that there has been some duplicate effort to fix the
same things - so here's an overview. The ones with X are the ones I
20 matches
Mail list logo
