On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 10:47:57PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:35:00PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
> > That means in the next weeks probably!
> > If you know of any regres
Leo Izen:
> On 7/8/22 09:52, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 10:36:54AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>>> On Thu, 7 Jul 2022, at 22:47, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
previosuly suggested names i found in my very unorgnaized notes:
Mellin, Gauss, Galois, Viterbi, Dar
On 7/8/22 09:52, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 10:36:54AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2022, at 22:47, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
previosuly suggested names i found in my very unorgnaized notes:
Mellin, Gauss, Galois, Viterbi, Darwin, Von Neumann, lorentz
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 10:36:54AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2022, at 22:47, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > previosuly suggested names i found in my very unorgnaized notes:
> > Mellin, Gauss, Galois, Viterbi, Darwin, Von Neumann, lorentz, poincaré,
> > desitter, de broglie
On 7/8/2022 7:23 AM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
On 08/07/2022 12:17, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
The lavfi changes, more specifically wrapped_avframe, still rely on
sizeof(AVFrame) being used outside lavu. We really need to stop
spreading its use and find a way to change this behavior.
I have tri
On 08/07/2022 12:17, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
The lavfi changes, more specifically wrapped_avframe, still rely on
sizeof(AVFrame) being used outside lavu. We really need to stop
spreading its use and find a way to change this behavior.
I have tried like two different solutions and both were reje
The lavfi changes, more specifically wrapped_avframe, still rely on
sizeof(AVFrame) being used outside lavu. We really need to stop
spreading its use and find a way to change this behavior.
I have tried like two different solutions and both were rejected, so
it's not going to be me.
wrapped_av
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 10:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2022, at 22:47, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > previosuly suggested names i found in my very unorgnaized notes:
> > Mellin, Gauss, Galois, Viterbi, Darwin, Von Neumann, lorentz, poincaré,
> > desitter, de broglie
>
> Did w
On Thu, 7 Jul 2022, at 22:47, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> previosuly suggested names i found in my very unorgnaized notes:
> Mellin, Gauss, Galois, Viterbi, Darwin, Von Neumann, lorentz, poincaré,
> desitter, de broglie
Did we not use Lorentz for 5.0? I'm ok for re-using it, though.
Else, I woul
On Sun, 19 Jun 2022, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 4:59 PM Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 7:35 AM Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
>> That
On 7/7/2022 5:51 PM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
On 07.07.2022 22:47, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:35:00PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi all
As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
That means in the next weeks probably!
If you know of a
On 07.07.2022 22:47, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:35:00PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi all
As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
That means in the next weeks probably!
If you know of any regressions, security issues or other major bu
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:35:00PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
> That means in the next weeks probably!
> If you know of any regressions, security issues or other major bugs,
> please help fixing them
>
> Also a
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 4:59 PM Marton Balint wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 7:35 AM Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
> >> That means in the next weeks pr
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 7:35 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
Hi all
As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
That means in the next weeks probably!
If you know of any regressions, security issues or other major bugs,
please help
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 7:35 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
> That means in the next weeks probably!
> If you know of any regressions, security issues or other major bugs,
> please help fixing them
>
> Also as was sugg
Hi all
As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
That means in the next weeks probably!
If you know of any regressions, security issues or other major bugs,
please help fixing them
Also as was suggested before, this release will get the "LTS" tag
unless people feel thats
17 matches
Mail list logo
