On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 02:38:33AM -0700, Roger Pack wrote:
> On 1/23/15, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:06:39AM -0700, Roger Pack wrote:
> >> OK I have made modifications to the dshow source so that it adds the
> >> ability to specify capture device by "more unique" nam
On 1/23/15, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:06:39AM -0700, Roger Pack wrote:
>> OK I have made modifications to the dshow source so that it adds the
>> ability to specify capture device by "more unique" name, capture pin
>> by name, crossbar device support [this is basicall
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:06:39AM -0700, Roger Pack wrote:
> OK I have made modifications to the dshow source so that it adds the
> ability to specify capture device by "more unique" name, capture pin
> by name, crossbar device support [this is basically any capture source
> with multiple inputs--
OK I have made modifications to the dshow source so that it adds the
ability to specify capture device by "more unique" name, capture pin
by name, crossbar device support [this is basically any capture source
with multiple inputs--definitely the most requested feature to date]
and ability to use "c
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Zach Swena
wrote:
> Do we know how much it would cost to get this done? A capture card like
> the ESCAP.TV ones are pretty cheap so getting a device to test isn't hard
> or expensive. As I understand it basically any capture device with
> multiple analog inputs
Do we know how much it would cost to get this done? A capture card like
the ESCAP.TV ones are pretty cheap so getting a device to test isn't hard
or expensive. As I understand it basically any capture device with
multiple analog inputs uses this feature.
Zach
On Nov 22, 2014 11:15 AM, "Roger Pac
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Zach Swena
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone elaborate on why direct show devices that use crossbar are not
> supported by FFmpeg? Also, what is keeping someone from taking the
> crossbar support found in VLC and porting it to FFmpeg, assuming the said
> port complied
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 02:03:08PM -0800, Zach Swena wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone elaborate on why direct show devices that use crossbar are not
> supported by FFmpeg? Also, what is keeping someone from taking the
> crossbar support found in VLC and porting it to FFmpeg, assuming the said
> port c
Hi,
Can anyone elaborate on why direct show devices that use crossbar are not
supported by FFmpeg? Also, what is keeping someone from taking the
crossbar support found in VLC and porting it to FFmpeg, assuming the said
port complied with the FFmpeg code conventions? The current work around
seems
