> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:04 AM James Darnley wrote:
> I think the feature selection is fine as-is, if you want to clarify
> the comments go ahead. AVX512 wouldn't be useful with a subset even
> smaller then what the plain AVX512 is looking for (there is also no
> CPUs with any smaller set, afa
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:04 AM James Darnley wrote:
>
> Has there been a discussion about which features should go with which flag?
I think the feature selection is fine as-is, if you want to clarify
the comments go ahead. AVX512 wouldn't be useful with a subset even
smaller then what the plain
While cherry-picking some stuff for avx512 I have noticed that ffmpeg
has a discrepancy in the comments for the two avx512 flags.
Lets start with the public header
libavutil/cpu.h
56│ #define AV_CPU_FLAG_AVX512 0x10 ///< AVX-512 functions: requires
OS support even if YMM/ZMM register
