Hi,
I answered, but the position of the CC is such that there is nothing we can do
about NG in general.
Suspension will not achieve anything (and in this particular case, seems a bit
heavy-handed), and permanent ban is not something that the CC can do under the
current CoC.
Br,
Le 25 mars 20
Hi Kieran
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 09:32:38AM +, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> Come on, this is being deliberately facetious, FFmpeg has no legal
> entity that they could give it to.
Software in the Public Interest, Inc. a tax exempt 501(c)3 non profit
can legally own for FFmpeg any
Hi,
Le 25 mars 2025 10:55:35 GMT+02:00, Nicolas George a écrit :
>Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel (HE12025-03-25):
>> The server belongs to @Jean-Baptiste Kempf
>
>Are you saying that the tweet that says “giving ***us*** a 160-core ARM
>server” (emphasis mine) is a lie?
By that logic, any claim
Come on, this is being deliberately facetious, FFmpeg has no legal
entity that they could give it to.
The server was given to @Jean-Baptiste Kempf for the purposes of
FFmpeg development and I host it.
Martin makes extensive use of it for development.
@Cc This is unnecessarily aggressive and I wou
Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel (HE12025-03-25):
> The server belongs to @Jean-Baptiste Kempf
Are you saying that the tweet that says “giving ***us*** a 160-core ARM
server” (emphasis mine) is a lie?
--
Nicolas George
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ff
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025, 08:47 Zhao Zhili,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From Twitter
> > Unlike the majority of hardware/cloud companies, Ampere have supported
> the FFmpeg project by giving us a 160-core ARM server for development.
>
> Is the Ampere ARM server still available? Is it only for FATE or other
> par
Hi,
>From Twitter
> Unlike the majority of hardware/cloud companies, Ampere have supported the
> FFmpeg project by giving us a 160-core ARM server for development.
Is the Ampere ARM server still available? Is it only for FATE or other
particular purpose?
Can I request to have access to the Ampe
