Quoting Zhao Zhili (2023-08-18 20: 11:31)
> From: Zhao Zhili
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 14:29:44 +0200
Message-ID: <169270738483.26513.18411031229205897...@lain.khirnov.net>
User-Agent: alot/0.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
>
> It still different than AV_TIME_BASE_Q in C, like you cannot take
> address of AV
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 02:11:31AM +0800, Zhao Zhili wrote:
> From: Zhao Zhili
>
> It still different than AV_TIME_BASE_Q in C, like you cannot take
> address of AV_TIME_BASE_Q in C++. It's better than nothing.
> ---
iam in favor of better C++ compatibility of public headers
thx
[...]
--
Mich
From: Zhao Zhili
It still different than AV_TIME_BASE_Q in C, like you cannot take
address of AV_TIME_BASE_Q in C++. It's better than nothing.
---
libavutil/avutil.h | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libavutil/avutil.h b/libavutil/avutil.h
index 64b68bdbd3..5201cc6c5e 1006
