On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Claudio Freire
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Robert Krüger wrote:
> >> It's been the plan all along to negotiate the removal of the
> >> experimental flag after pushing those changes discussed and heavily
> >> tested in ticket #2686.
> >>
> >> If anythi
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Robert Krüger wrote:
>> It's been the plan all along to negotiate the removal of the
>> experimental flag after pushing those changes discussed and heavily
>> tested in ticket #2686.
>>
>> If anything, this thread expresses support for that plan ;)
>>
>> So, I'd sti
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Claudio Freire
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Robert Krüger
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I didn't test myself but iiuc, the aac encoder produces better
> >> quality than all other liba
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Robert Krüger wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I didn't test myself but iiuc, the aac encoder produces better
>> quality than all other libavcodec audio encoders and better
>> quality than the libvo-aac encoder that
The only real major feature the encoder doesn't quite have working fine yet
is TNS, for which I have a patch which I will push later today.
Everything else works fine. There are some infinite loops happening with
non-default extreme settings (very high bitrates with low frequency cutoffs
with the f
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I didn't test myself but iiuc, the aac encoder produces better
> quality than all other libavcodec audio encoders and better
> quality than the libvo-aac encoder that is not marked as
> experimental, so the flag should be removed
Hi!
I didn't test myself but iiuc, the aac encoder produces better
quality than all other libavcodec audio encoders and better
quality than the libvo-aac encoder that is not marked as
experimental, so the flag should be removed.
Please comment, Carl Eugen
__
