Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Issue tarcker state for fate tests

2024-11-06 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 01:18:43PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 06:59:57AM +0800, Steven Liu wrote: > > Michael Niedermayer 于2024年11月5日 周二04:34写道: > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > I think, in general most fixed issues (both bugs and features) > > > should have a test add

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Issue tarcker state for fate tests

2024-11-06 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 06:59:57AM +0800, Steven Liu wrote: > Michael Niedermayer 于2024年11月5日 周二04:34写道: > > > Hi all > > > > I think, in general most fixed issues (both bugs and features) > > should have a test added to fate. > > > > To make that actually happen i suggest to introduce a state lik

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Issue tarcker state for fate tests

2024-11-04 Thread Steven Liu
Michael Niedermayer 于2024年11月5日 周二04:34写道: > Hi all > > I think, in general most fixed issues (both bugs and features) > should have a test added to fate. > > To make that actually happen i suggest to introduce a state like > "fixed_and_fate_test" to trac > > That way we can track if a closed issu

[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Issue tarcker state for fate tests

2024-11-04 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi all I think, in general most fixed issues (both bugs and features) should have a test added to fate. To make that actually happen i suggest to introduce a state like "fixed_and_fate_test" to trac That way we can track if a closed issue has had a fate test added (using the existing "fixed" to