Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Async M:N asynchronous API model discussion

2015-09-25 Thread wm4
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:43:37 +0200 Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:22:51 +0200 > Clément Bœsch wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > With the increasing number of hardware accelerated API, the need for a > > proper M:N asynchronous API is growing. We've observed that with MMAL > > and VideoT

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Async M:N asynchronous API model discussion

2015-09-25 Thread Nicolas George
Le quartidi 4 vendémiaire, an CCXXIV, Alexis Ballier a écrit : > - Why not merging AVPacket into AVFrame ? This would restore the > symmetry between encoding and decoding. This is actually what V4L > does. I would gladly support that. > - This could go one step further with a lavfi wrapper: d

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Async M:N asynchronous API model discussion

2015-09-25 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:22:51 +0200 Clément Bœsch wrote: > Hi, > > With the increasing number of hardware accelerated API, the need for a > proper M:N asynchronous API is growing. We've observed that with MMAL > and VideoToolBox accelerations typically. Similarly, the incoming > MediaCodec hwacce

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Async M:N asynchronous API model discussion

2015-09-25 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote: > Hi, > > With the increasing number of hardware accelerated API, the need for a > proper M:N asynchronous API is growing. We've observed that with MMAL and > VideoToolBox accelerations typically. Similarly, the incoming MediaCodec > hwac

[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Async M:N asynchronous API model discussion

2015-09-25 Thread Clément Bœsch
Hi, With the increasing number of hardware accelerated API, the need for a proper M:N asynchronous API is growing. We've observed that with MMAL and VideoToolBox accelerations typically. Similarly, the incoming MediaCodec hwaccel is going to suffer from the same limitations. Some Libav developers