Hi,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> It has already been demonstrated that the de Bruijn method has benefits
> >> ove
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> It has already been demonstrated that the de Bruijn method has benefits
>> over the current implementation: commit
>> 971d12b7f9d7be3ca8eb98e6c04ed521f83cbd3c.
>>
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> It has already been demonstrated that the de Bruijn method has benefits
> over the current implementation: commit
> 971d12b7f9d7be3ca8eb98e6c04ed521f83cbd3c.
> That commit implemented it for long long, this extends it to the int
>
It has already been demonstrated that the de Bruijn method has benefits
over the current implementation: commit
971d12b7f9d7be3ca8eb98e6c04ed521f83cbd3c.
That commit implemented it for long long, this extends it to the int version.
Tested with FATE.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
---
libavu
