On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le sextidi 16 vendémiaire, an CCXXIV, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit :
>> Anyway, it seems to me that for whatever reason short circuit
>> evaluation is not respected by the GCC preprocessor (I lack the energy
>> or interest to investigate why, i
Le sextidi 16 vendémiaire, an CCXXIV, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit :
> Anyway, it seems to me that for whatever reason short circuit
> evaluation is not respected by the GCC preprocessor (I lack the energy
> or interest to investigate why, it seems ridiculous to me):
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bu
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 12:29:35PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> Commit 6dac8c8327 disabled av_uninit for clang, due to some useless warnings.
>> The concept of av_uninit is inherently useful though. This patch silences a
>> bunch
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 12:29:35PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> Commit 6dac8c8327 disabled av_uninit for clang, due to some useless warnings.
> The concept of av_uninit is inherently useful though. This patch silences a
> bunch of warnings on clang e.g
> http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=20
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> Commit 6dac8c8327 disabled av_uninit for clang, due to some useless warnings.
> The concept of av_uninit is inherently useful though. This patch silences a
> bunch of warnings on clang e.g
> http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=2015091818
Commit 6dac8c8327 disabled av_uninit for clang, due to some useless warnings.
The concept of av_uninit is inherently useful though. This patch silences a
bunch of warnings on clang e.g
http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=20150918181527&log=compile&slot=x86_64-darwin-clang-polly-vectorize-stripmine-
