On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Mark Harris wrote:
>> -if (cluster_idx >= track->entry)
>> +/* GCC 5.2 wants to "optimize" cluster_idx >= track->entry to the below
>> + * expression. We actually mean cluster_idx >= track->entry. */
>> +if (cluster_idx - track->entry >= 0)
>>
> -if (cluster_idx >= track->entry)
> +/* GCC 5.2 wants to "optimize" cluster_idx >= track->entry to the below
> + * expression. We actually mean cluster_idx >= track->entry. */
> +if (cluster_idx - track->entry >= 0)
> return 0;
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Ganesh Aj
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri,
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
>
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri,
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Hendrik Leppkes
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Oct 1
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Hendrik Leppkes
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Hendrik Leppkes
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> >> wrote:
> >>> This patch results in iden
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>>> This patch results in identical behavior of movenc, and suppresses
>>> -Wstrict-overflow
>>> warnings obs
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>> This patch results in identical behavior of movenc, and suppresses
>> -Wstrict-overflow
>> warnings observed in GCC 5.2:
>> http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=201509262
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> This patch results in identical behavior of movenc, and suppresses
> -Wstrict-overflow
> warnings observed in GCC 5.2:
> http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=20150926231053&log=compile&slot=x86_64-archlinux-gcc-threads-misc,
> "warning:
This patch results in identical behavior of movenc, and suppresses
-Wstrict-overflow
warnings observed in GCC 5.2:
http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=20150926231053&log=compile&slot=x86_64-archlinux-gcc-threads-misc,
"warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur when assuming that (X - c) >
This patch results in identical behavior of movenc, and suppresses
-Wstrict-overflow
warnings observed in GCC 5.2:
http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=20150926231053&log=compile&slot=x86_64-archlinux-gcc-threads-misc,
"warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur when assuming that (X - c) >
13 matches
Mail list logo