On 14 May 2018 at 20:29, Patrick Keroulas wrote:
> From: Damien Riegel
>
> This codec is already capable of depacking some combinations of pixel
> formats and depth as defined in the RFC4175. The only difference between
> progressive and interlace is that either a packet will contain the whole
>
From: Damien Riegel
This codec is already capable of depacking some combinations of pixel
formats and depth as defined in the RFC4175. The only difference between
progressive and interlace is that either a packet will contain the whole
frame, or only a field of the frame.
There is no mechanism f
